AI ships the code.
ewake keeps production reliable.
It detects on its own β before anyone gets paged.
The reliability loop
One loop that keeps production reliable.
Detect, investigate, fix, track, learn β a closed loop around a live map of your production. It runs on its own.
Saturday, 11:04. Payments are slowing down and nobody knows yet.
The same incident runs through the four stations that follow.
No threshold needed β it read the curve against the map.
Illustrative incident
11:06. The answer arrives where the team already is.
And it holds up when someone pushes back.
Root cause found for the payment-api slowdown.
How sure are you it isn't the database? It bit us last month.
postgres-main stayed flat through the whole window β connection pool at 34%, query p99 unchanged. The rise starts four minutes after #4821 landed, and only on the two services that call the handler it changed.
A conclusion you can question is a different thing from one you have to accept.
11:08. It doesn't tell you what to do. It writes it.
And it stops exactly where your rules say it should.
It wrote the fix. You still hold the merge button.
11:39. It held for thirty minutes, so it closed.
The curve you met at 11:04, finished.
Thirty minutes of watching before it said done. Had it drifted again, the loop would have started over.
24 August, 03:12. The same thing happens again.
Nobody found out on Monday. There was nothing to find out.
The story started with nobody noticing. It ends with nobody needing to.
The loop closes
The map is smarter than when you started reading.
One incident in, one skill out. Every loop leaves ewake with more of your production mapped β so the next detection is faster.
Running in production at
Frequently asked questions
You've got questions,
we've got answers.
Still have questions?
Book a quick call with the team.
